【帖子标题】：For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]
【帖子标题】：对于那些从NeurIPS、CVPR、ECCV等会议拿到评审意见，同时用斯坦福那种智能体审稿人测试过自己论文的人，两边的评审差异有多大？[D]
【帖子正文】： Hello,
【帖子正文】： 你好，
I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms.
我很好奇人类审稿人和大语言模型给出的评审意见之间会有哪些差异。
Any insight is welcome, thank you!
欢迎分享任何见解，谢谢！
submitted by
由
/u/obliviousphoenix2003
/u/obliviousphoenix2003 提交
[link]
[链接]
[comments]
[评论]